The same 15 seconds of video 04, same source, same prompt, same two reference images, reviewed by the same QA model. 2.0 fast caps its input at 15 seconds, so that is the whole of what one pass can do.
| Defect | 2.0 mini | 2.0 fast |
|---|---|---|
| Our bottle becomes a plain blue one while being sprayed | fatal at 8.0s | fatal at 9s |
| Stylist's gold bracelet jumps to the other hand | major at 2.0s | major at 2s |
| Hair is already wet and smooth before any spray | fatal at 5.7s | major at 9s |
| Distorted fingers on a fast-moving hand | — | minor at 4s |
Reading it honestly. The one-fatal gap is the hair jump, which both tiers contain and which
the reviewer simply graded differently on the two files — that jump is the donor's own hard cut and is present in
the untouched original. The two defects that matter, the bottle and the bracelet, appear in both at the same
second. The product failure is not a question of tier. It happens where the bottle is blurred and changing
silhouette in a moving hand, which leaves the model nothing stable to repaint. The fix that follows from this is
dedicated product footage to cut to, rather than a dearer model to repaint a blur. Verdicts are in qa/.